tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3610337109834673799.post6118748678851405471..comments2009-07-19T07:23:50.816-07:00Thee Phoenixnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3610337109834673799.post-58298004167909154852009-07-19T07:23:50.816-07:002009-07-19T07:23:50.816-07:00It&#39;s obvious that 300 was nowhere near a proper sample size but that wasn&#39;t the issue. <br /><br />There is no way any ordinary person would be able to get a proper sample of the millions of Yugioh users out there.<br /><br />This was simply a glimpse at our own community and how our own users felt. <br /><br />It may be completely different for people in another state, or in another country. But for the users of this site, it remains clear who the victors were. <br /><br />~~~~~~~~~~~~<br /><br />Also rephrasing the statement that the most powerful decks become the most hated into your, &quot;which decks beat you the most&quot; was pretty childish.<br /><br />I wrote an extensive amount on why Power doesn&#39;t necessarily equal hate and I showed how some of the top decks were not being hated on.<br />All of it was discussed in this article which, as I can tell, you didn&#39;t fully read. <br /><br />Also, by your logic, lightsworn is the most powerful deck in our meta. That&#39;s been disproven time and time again by countless tournaments. Lightsworn isn&#39;t consistent enough to get that title. <br /><br />~~~~~~~~~~<br /><br />So we peered into the eyes of 300 people. If you could get the proper sample size of 10-20,000 good job. <br /><br />But as you know that isn&#39;t logically feasible for most people.<br /><br />Criticize us for something we&#39;re actually capable of doing.UniMetagamenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3610337109834673799.post-26682638340468075622009-07-18T19:11:20.927-07:002009-07-18T19:11:20.927-07:00I don&#39;t think that 300 people represents any sort of adequate sample size for a globe-spanning issue, especially for a question that was likely frequently interpreted as &quot;Which deck beats you the most?&quot;Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3610337109834673799.post-16923070733650982222009-07-16T15:40:47.190-07:002009-07-16T15:40:47.190-07:00*Skill Successor and Heterogeneous are amazing if you put the right cards in there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3610337109834673799.post-3089130878862118952009-07-16T12:08:00.338-07:002009-07-16T12:08:00.338-07:00Before i reply, let me tell everyone what Future Vision does first:<br /><br />When a monster is Normal Summoned, it is removed from play. The removed monster is returned to the field in face-up Attack Position during its controller&#39;s next Standby Phase.<br /><br />It&#39;s also a Field Spell<br /><br />~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br /><br />Now then... how is that tremendously better than Skill successor which is a plus 1 most times and heterogeneous conflict which is a potential plus 3.<br /><br />Both of them give advantage instantly and resolve their effects instantly, when you desire.<br /><br />~~~~~~~~~<br /><br />I&#39;m not saying Future Vision is bad I&#39;m just saying how is it much better than the other 2 cards?<br /><br />Both give card advantage, or atleast 1 for 1&#39;s, and both are good in a lot of decks. <br /><br />Future Vision would only be good in 1 deck designed around it.<br /><br />~~~~~~~~~<br /><br />If I&#39;m missing something here let me know.<br /><br />But besides that I didn&#39;t review trash.UniMetagamenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3610337109834673799.post-45432181997267908112009-07-16T11:05:43.141-07:002009-07-16T11:05:43.141-07:00Wow, you review trash like Skill Successor and Heterogeneous Conflict, yet don&#39;t mention Future Vision?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com